Getting Away with Blatant Foreign Policy Lies
It’s been more than two-and-a-half weeks since an attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya killed four American diplomats, including widely respected ambassador Christopher Stevens. Yet, President Obama STILL has not publicly acknowledged that attack as terrorism.
Why hasn’t Obama publicly acknowledged that the murders in Benghazi were the result of a terrorist attack?
His Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta did in a Pentagon news conference on Thursday saying flatly: “It was a terrorist attack.”
The Obama Administration cover up of the Libya attacks is unconscionable. Even last week, Obama was still blaming a YouTube video and apologizing for America.
Officials in high-ranking positions with the Obama Administration contradict themselves repeatedly — one of them is now backtracking and trying to falsely claim Obama blamed the Libya attack on terrorism from the beginning. Right. If you buy that, then I have some ocean front property to see you in Kansas.
Mike Huckabee said Obama’s cover-up of the true nature of the Libya terror attack is worse than Watergate.
Huckabeel said on his program:
“Let’s just get blunt. No way to sugar coat this — We’ve been lied to. We have flat-out been lied to. They know they’ve lied…. Richard Nixon was forced out of office because he lied and because he covered some stuff up. I’m going to be blunt and tell you this — nobody died in Watergate.”
It is likely this story will fade this next week and once again, Obama and his team of thugs and criminals will get away with one of the most blatant foreign policy lies in our recent history — a cover-up to protect his failed Middle East policy of appeasement and apology.