Petraeus Testifies That He Knew Benghazi Was Terrorism Immediately … But CIA Info Was Changed?

For two hours, David Patraeus testified before lawmakers today. The most pertinent information from that testimony was this: the information and talking points intelligence turned over to the White House regarding the Libya attack, were CHANGED after they were handed over to the White House.

The one question that has not been answered is WHO MADE THESE CHANGES BEFORE THEY WERE HANDED TO RICE for release?
Whoever made this change is responsible for the dispersal of UNTRUTH to the American people and the world regarding the motives behind the attack.

Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that “Al Qaeda involvement” was suspected — but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed.
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who spoke to reporters after Petraeus testified before the House Intelligence Committee, indicated he and other lawmakers still have plenty of questions about the aftermath of the attack.

“No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points,” he said.
Petraeus was heading next to the Senate Intelligence Committee to testify.
Petraeus’ testimony both challenges the Obama administration’s repeated claims that the attack was a “spontaneous” protest over an anti-Islam video, and according to King conflicts with his own briefing to lawmakers on Sept. 14. Sources have said Petraeus, in that briefing, also described the attack as a protest that spun out of control.

“His testimony today was that from the start, he had told us that this was a terrorist attack,” King said, adding that he told Petraeus he had a “different recollection.”
Still, the claim that the CIA’s original talking points were changed is sure to stoke controversy on the Hill.

“The original talking points were much more specific about Al Qaeda involvement. And yet the final ones just said indications of extremists,” King said, adding that the final version was the product of a vague “inter-agency process.”
Further, King said a CIA analyst specifically told lawmakers that the Al Qaeda affiliates line “was taken out.”

Read more at Fox Nation

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Bill Crandall

    Cover up! Even in the face of the truth, Obama and his minions will spin lies. Fast and furious has been the aame way. Discusting and dishonorable.

  • Manuel Rodriguez

    This is typical of the Chicago “mobster” type of corrupt politics. If the data doesnt fit change it to fit your narrative.

  • Gary A. Talley

    The General told what any sane American already knew. Just another example of how our Government is corrupt, and takes the American people for idiots.

  • Brave men died and all the White house could do was LIE

  • Archie

    Even if obobo was pictured firing the mortar that killed our Seals there would be not one thing done. The media would simply write a story that obobo was fighting to save our people when there was an equipment malfunction. It would further be pointed out that the equipment was defective and George W Bush was responsible.
    obobo would be given another Nob*ll Prize.