Colorado Sheriffs Sue State Over New Gun Control Laws

Screen Shot 2013-05-19 at 1.27.45 PM
A consortium of plaintiffs led by 54 of Colorado’s 62 elected county sheriffs filed a lawsuit in federal court against the state Friday in an effort to overturn two new gun control bills that are set to go into effect on July 1.

The plaintiffs have in their sights one law that effectively bans all firearm magazines, and one that requires a background check for every gun transfer when the gun will be in the possession of someone other than the owner for more than 72 hours.

“On one hand, I’m proud to be part of this historic case,” said Weld County Sheriff John Cooke, who spoke on behalf of 18 sheriffs who attended a press conference announcing the suit.

“But on the other hand, it saddens me that we have to be here at all,” he added. “It should never have gotten to this point in the first place.”

El Paso County Sheriff Terry Maketa said the laws are not only unconstitutional, but also confusing and unenforceable.

For example, the ban on magazines was discussed by its Democratic sponsors as applying only to those that hold more than 15 rounds, in response to mass-shooting incidents in Aurora, Colo., and Newtown, Conn.

But the law also outlaws any magazine that can be easily converted to hold more than 15 rounds, which applies to practically all magazines with a removable base plate that can be replaced with an after-market extender.

After July 1, the owners of such magazines cannot sell them, loan them or give them away. In effect, it means that even if they give their weapon to someone else for safekeeping — or, in the case of one wheelchair-bound plaintiff who spoke Friday, to hold momentarily as he gets in and out of his chair — they will be breaking the law.

The background-check requirement is also unduly burdensome, the sheriffs say.

Read more at The Daily Caller

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • These men are the perfect example of how law enforcement officers should be.

  • Robert S Moulds

    The laws seem dubious so it is no surprise the sheriffs turned their backs on them If they were more reasonable laws or better yet stayed with the current laws this would not be a problem.

    • Rattlerjake

      BS – Any gun law that infringes on an individual’s right to bear arms is a problem. That means any restrictions like background checks, permits, classes, etc. Libturds want all of these infringements on the second amendment but fight tooth and nail to prevent restrictions on voting eligibility.

  • rikker5700

    Jefferson county sheriff mink was not one of these. He is an anti gun pos right along with the state house dumbocraps.