Quantcast
This website is a member of Liberty Alliance, which has been named as an company.

DOJ Tells Workers to Verballly Affirm Their Homosexuality

The Department of Justice has been accused of religious intolerance and viewpoint discrimination after workers were sent an email directing them to verbally affirm homosexuality, according to a religious liberty law firm representing a DOJ whistleblower.
Liberty Counsel said DOJ employees were emailed a brochure called “LGBT Inclusion at Work: The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Managers.” The brochure was created as a resource from DOJ Pride, an association of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender employees of the DOJ.

A Department of Justice spokesperson did not return calls seeking comment. Fox News also reached out to DOJ Pride for comment – but emails were not answered. …

Read more at Fox News

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.

comments

  • antiliberalcryptonite

    It’s almost time to hit the re-set switch on society.

    • http://twitter.com/jsbrodhead Jeff Brodhead

      Almost…past time.

  • Dowhatsright

    If we don’t stop these perverts the U.S. will stand for
    United Sodomites.

  • gmack

    Did they also tell Heterosexuals to state their status. If men I worked with stood up and stated they were homo I would demand separate and equal restrooms for them.

  • MHSnider

    Who cares?????????? If all the church going have such a problem with gay people take the government OUT of marriage. Problem solved. Jan I have told you this before but you insisit on pushing the friggen hate. It ain’t that hard. Just get all forms of government OUT of the marriage business and put it back in the church where it belongs. How hard is that to push????????? But NO you all have to push HATE!!!!!!!! WTF would Jesus say????????????????? HUH??????????? My guess is NOT what you are pushing.

    • dmbunce

      I care!!! That’s who cares! And millions of other Christians!

    • MrLogical

      MHS: It sounds like YOU have a big hate problem.

    • RedMeatState

      what are you calling hate?

    • LightOfReason

      That would not be enough for the Homosexuals; they would not be satisfied with that.

      At this point I would agree with the government recognizing legal civil unions but they will not stop until they rub our nose in their sin and force us to say that it is good. It is a choice to sin and unless you are raped you also choose to have sex.

    • billygeturgun

      I can assure you that Jesus would not say WTF! And telling people what the Bible says about marriage being between one man and one woman is not hate, it is the truth. The hate comes in when those opposed to the truth of God hate those of us who adhere to the truth of God. Jesus would say to those of us who stand for him, stand for traditional marriage, stand against abortion, etc, etc, etc, “well done, thou good and faithful servant”. Jesus also says to obey the government up to the point that the government charges contrary to God’s Word. Again, He certainly would not say WTF! That would be people like you saying that. But there is still time for you to repent or you can wallow in your self and be left behind.

      • Watching_and_Waiting

        Right on ‘billygeturgun’! Thanks for Standing Up for Our God and Savior!

  • MrLogical

    Welcome to Obama’s New World.
    Next, they’re going to start urging kids in Kindergarten and elementary school to openly declare their homosexuality.

  • RedMeatState

    This is government taking an active stance and assault against Christianity. Government will become more pro-homo and anti-Christ from now on.

    • Alex M

      It isn’t the job of government to be pro- or anti- Christ. It’s the function of government to determine and enforce civil and criminal laws, determine budgetary and fiscal policies, and protect freedoms. That includes religious freedoms, but not the promotion of religious dogmas and belief systems. That’s the domain of religious organizations themselves.

  • foxxybey

    the DOJ is lead by a idiot, a brown shirt idiot. When the un-natural persons declare how immoral they are it is time to change the government or go down in defeat. God says there are certain things he will judge a nation for and this is just one of three more we declare ourselves better then God.

  • Alex M

    Difficult to see what the problem is.

  • http://twitter.com/jsbrodhead Jeff Brodhead

    The Departure Of Justice (DOJ) is no longer viable.

  • Zepp

    Is anyone else as sick of hearing about homosexuals as I am?! I can’t even watch tv anymore.

  • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

    These kinds of things would not be occurring if the Constitution was as Biblically compatible as Christians so desperately want it to be. The fact is, these and many other abominations are commonplace in America today because the framers failed to expressly establish the Constitutional Republic upon Yahweh’s immutable morality as codified in His perfect law and altogether righteous judgments (Psalm 19:7-11).

    Take sodomy for example, had the framers established a government of, by, and for Yahweh (instead of a humanistic one of, by, and for the people), based upon Yahweh’s triune moral law (including Leviticus 18:22 and 20:13), there would be no sodomite agenda in America today because no sodomite would dare risk exposure by petitioning the government for his rights.

    Time for Christians to realize we’ve, once again, been taken and that the Constitution is NOT the Biblical or Christian document we’ve told it is.

    Find out how much you REALLY know about the Constitution. Take our Constitution Survey at bibleversusconstitution.org/ConstitutionSurvey.html and receive a free copy of the 85-page “Primer” of the 565-page “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective.”

    • billygeturgun

      I’d say the framers never imagined America would become the cesspool of gays, lesbians, abortion murderers, athiests, socially engineered wackos otherwise known as liberals or they would have been more specific about of God, by God, and for God. Everything they did do inferred God was the center of our new nation and of the people. The Constitution IS still derived from a belief in and fear of God no matter what subversive people want to say. Denying that only plays into the hands of those same heathens that want to completely do away with any mention of God in America. We, as Christians, need to just stand up for America by kneeling down and praying fervently to God to return us to what we once were, and that being a great nation UNDER GOD! Since we have forgotten that we are a nation under God, we are about to become a nation gone under!

      • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

        The problems with the Constitution are much deeper than what the framers may have overlooked or couldn’t have envisioned. There is hardly an article or amendment that, in some fashion, is not antithetical, if not seditious, to Yahweh’s sovereignty and morality.

        I hope you’ll take our survey, so I can send you a free copy of the “Primer.”

      • Watching_and_Waiting

        ‘billygeturgun’, I agree with you. You said it well. There are no documents nor forms of government anywhere which can eradicate sin and evil from mankind, nor from any nation. Not until Christ’s reign in the Millenium will there be a completely Just and Godly form of government. And even those people, according to the Bible, won’t be 100% committed to God’s way of doing things, since the Bible says that some of those people will later be deceived into rebelling against God (and will then be sentenced to an eternity away from God).

        • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

          WatchingandWaiting: “Not until Christ’s reign in the Millenium will there be a completely Just and Godly form of government.”

          In the meantime, which would you prefer: 1) a government based upon the capricious laws of fickle men, run by unregenerate men, or 2) a government based upon the perfect law and altogether righteous judgments of Yahweh (Psalm 19;7-11), led by regenerate men?

          • Alex M

            Do we get to do the bit about stoning whores to death?

          • SRM29

            I prefer freedom over a theocracy that would eventually force citizens to adhere to God’s law or else. Which sounds a whole lot like Islamic countries. “A government based upon the perfect law and altogether righteous judgments of God” is still run by men and all men can be corrupted.

            God gives all the free will to choose or not choose Him. Freedom IS Biblical.

          • http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/ Ted R. Weiland

            When one understands that the principal means by which we keep the First Commandment is by observing Yahweh’s other moral laws (of course, under the New Covenant, through Christ as Lord and Savior, motivated by love) and that idolatry is not so much about statues as it is statutes, it becomes clear that all governments are theocratic, serving either the true God or some false god, demonstrated by what laws they keep and consider the supreme law of the land.

            Furthermore, all non-existent false gods (1 Corinthians 8:4-6) always have been and always will represent we the people in
            one form or another.

            “There is no escaping theocracy. A government’s laws reflect
            its morality, and the source of that morality (or, more often than not, immorality) is its god. It is never a question of theocracy or no theocracy, but whose theocracy. The American people, by way of their elected officials, are the source of the Constitutional Republic’s laws. Therefore, the Constitutional
            Republic’s god is WE THE PEOPLE.

            “People recoil at the idea of a theocracy’s morality being forced upon them, but because all governments are theocracies, someone’s morality is always being enforced. This is an inevitability of government. The question is which god, theocracy, laws, and morality will we choose to live under?”

            Excerpted from “The Preamble: WE THE PEOPLE vs. YAHWEH” at bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.html.

          • Alex M

            ” all governments are theocracies”

            I prefer secular atheistic theocracies myself. Their gods seem a mite more tolerant.

          • billygeturgun

            Absolutely correct however a true Christian knows that God has never forced Christianity on anyone. Yes, he was a dominant and fearful God with the Jews but because of their repeated refusal to follow his laws, he sent Christ to pay for the sins of all and the free will to choose Christ or not. One can argue until Christ comes about whether our nation was founded on Christian principles when history however answers that question. Arguing by splitting hairs does no one any good and only causes dirision. Our framers were undoubtedly Christian and were wanting freedom from the government controlled Church of England and others. Sadly, our own government is now becoming the anti-church and unless Christ returns soon, we will all suffer for believing in him. Yes, I anxiously await his return but I will also not falter in my belief and faith in God and in my ability to stand up for him at all costs.

          • Alex M

            “freedom from the government controlled Church of England”

            It’s worth pointing out that the Church of England is not controlled by the government. The Church of England is governed by the General Synod, and the head of the Church of England is the Monarch, not anyone in government.

          • billygeturgun

            Actually Mr. Anal Retentive, it is not worth pointing out because in one way or another, the gubmint had their hand in the Church of England elsewise how could the church of England control the citizens? Not without the gubmint doing their dirty work for them so yes, it was controlled by the gubmint! You totally missed the point because of that case of rectal cranial inversion!

          • Alex M

            The Church of England doesn’t control the citizens. The government has no hand in the Church of England. You’re free, of course, to believe anything you like, however odd. With practice, you can believe six impossible things before breakfast. One down, five to go, and the day is yet young.

  • junkmailbin

    we do enforce the law, we are the law. motto of the gay arabs minions

  • gemini34

    The homos are mentally ill. It was Adam and Eve, not Adam and Barney.

    • Alex M

      It wasn’t Adam and anybody. There is no need to predicate any view on society on an ancient mythological tale that has no basis in reality. The state of knowledge has moved on in the last three thousand years.

      • SRM29

        Nice tolerance. It is reality to Christians no matter what year it is.

        • Alex M

          I don’t mind if Christians want to believe it, though in my experience, most don’t, only scriptural fundamentalists. When you suggest ‘tolerance’, I suspect that what is meant is that others should be bound by your religious outlook. Adam & Eve is a myth, that’s all.

  • Jed54

    Homos are totally whacked….. Not a hate issue, just a mental issue….. Whacked….!

  • drikk

    The Great Satan.

  • CarnactheMagnificent

    I really like the verbally part. We can each have our own little tune to sing while we are at work to differentiate us from the coworkers doing the same job while thinking about something different!!!

  • Check the Source First

    The brochure in question was not sent by the Department of Justice, and didn’t ask anyone to “affirm” anything. The word “affirm” isn’t anywhere in the document.
    It’s a good idea to read the primary sources to validate an unsourced article before believing it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Warren-Reynolds/1179441694 Warren Reynolds

    LOL Do it at your own risk, who is obama really working for? Sure as hell isn;t America, I would say by all his actions and policys while in office, he works with/for the muslim brotherhood. What do people who follow sharia do to homosexuals,,,, GET IT NOW?

    • http://www.facebook.com/people/Warren-Reynolds/1179441694 Warren Reynolds

      Just like gun registration, find out who owns them, so you can rid them later….

    • Alex M

      How does that work? President Obama has expressed support for same-sex relationships. How does that square with Sharia law?

  • Jon Hutchison

    Perhaps homosexuals have a screw loose but you people are truely vile to hate so much. You stand there and speak of the good lord, that loves all his children for he made them, and in the same breath slap him in the face by having such contempt for your fellow man. I pity you, you better go to church for you all need it badly!

    • SRM29

      We are NOT hating. The Bible specifically states homosexuality is wrong. Truth isn’t hate. We have contempt for their sin, not the person underneath. Sounds to me you don’t know your Bible as much as you should.

  • Robert S Moulds

    I don’t think it is right to for queers to force their believes on others any more than straights have done to queers for hundreds of years. Other than more empathy in understanding what it is like to be imposed on.

  • http://www.facebook.com/RobertAlexander.Salvage Robert Alexander

    Woe to those who call evil good.