“F” the Federal Family
“Mother Russia” is a national personification of Russia, which appears in Russian patriotic posters, statues, etc. The usage of the term “mother” in reference to a nation or culture symbolizes the “spirit of collectivity.” (In the Soviet period, the term Motherland was preferred, as representing the multi-ethnic Soviet Union.) I have neighbors who are from Russia who tell me they and their circles used to laugh and mock the term “Mother Russia” and, to quote them, “never in our wildest dreams would we have thought we’d see something similar now happening here in the United States.”
What are they talking about? The “something similar” is NO ACCIDENT, folks … it’s the purposeful propagandized creeping into the ObeyMe government lexicon of the term “Federal Family.”
Whether used by HHS Secretary Sebelius, deputy administrator of FEMA, by the Director of the ATF, by both the Secretary and the assistant secretary at the DHS … this is an attempt to foster the perception of government as our caretaker. And remember “Julia?” I guess she was one of the daughters of the Federal Family.
This is to create a separate identity for Federal workers to pit them apart from We The People, so that yet another wedge is created in our society. Once they delineate a clear separation, they can begin to breed dissent between the factions … which ObeyMe and his communist cohorts have been doing his entire term. Soon it will be the “Federal Family” dressed all in black SWAT attire (oh wait … we’ve already started to see that all across the nation, now haven’t we?) against the people of the Constitutional republic. This is NOT good, folks, for freedom and liberty … when the patriots of this country, the descendants of our Founding Fathers, when “pro freedom” Americans are depicted as “anti government extremists” and “radicals.”
“Federal Family” … or Comrade … doesn’t matter, now, does it? They both mean the same. Or, perhaps ObeyMe prefers the national term so near and dear to Hitler’s heart: Fatherland. After all, he channeled Hitler’s “Fatherland” speech in his January 2013 inaugural.
In that speech we saw that the next four years would be a strenuous and concerted effort on his part (and Congress) to continue the establishment of the basic political and economic foundations necessary to convert America from an individualistic country of free men and women into a collectivist state, enslaving us further to each other, just like Hitler converted Germany.
Remember, he said: “The commitments we make to each other – through Medicare, and Medicaid, and Social Security – these things do not sap our initiative; they strengthen us. They do not make us a nation of takers; they free us to take the risks that make this country great.”
In other words, big government programs make us free.
He said: “Preserving our individual liberties ultimately requires collective action.”
In other words, in order for us to be individually free, the State must be involved. Collective action by definition tramples the individual’s will and rights. And he knew that a huge portion of the people listening to that speech didn’t agree (and still don’t) … he didn’t give a shit. His objective then, and every single day since, was to rile up his mobs of low-information gimme-dese and gimme-dats into a food stamp frenzy and marginalize the opposition.
Remember Nancy Pelosi’s praise of ObamaCare: “We see it as an entrepreneurial bill, a bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your passion, your aspirations because you will have health care.” … in other words, big government programs make us free.
In other words: There’s nothing like the “freedom” of having the government take over something so you don’t have to do it yourself or have any choice over it either, right? After all, who wants to work for something when you can make somebody else just give it to you?