Quantcast

Islamic Organization With Ties to HAMAS Asks Holder to Investigate Me.

Jan Morgan
 

About the author: Jan is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment Advocate/Speaker/ NRA Certified Firearms Instructor/ Associated Press Award winning investigative journalist/ Owner/Editor JanMorganMedia.com, Sr. Editor/Patriot Update/ Independent Constitutional Conservative. She is closely aligned with the Republican/ ... [read 's FULL BIO]

Screen Shot 2014-10-07 at 10.14.22 PM

Is anyone out there surprised that CAIR, (which is supposed to be looking out for the public relations interest of Islam in America), has NOT requested the Justice Department to investigate the mosque that the Oklahoma be-header attended?
After all, Fox News has shown repeatedly, interviews with a member of that mosque who says that behind closed doors, the mosque is teaching violence against non-muslims and jihad. It seems to me that CAIR would want to get to the bottom of that… but, mark my word, the last thing CAIR wants is any law enforcement agency infiltrating their mosques.

No… CAIR is more concerned about law abiding citizens like me who are concerned about people who attend mosques like that.

CAIR, (which has documented ties with the terrorist organization, HAMAS), has sent a letter asking Eric Holder and the Justice Department to do something about me. Read CAIR’s post about me on their website at this link.
Imagine that. Of course CAIR has its own history of problems with the federal government.. even the FBI had issues with CAIR over its terrorist ties.. (read about that here)

I knew that was coming. I expected them to make such a request.

Of course, their letter seeking the investigation, contains one lie after another..
Lets dissect it. By the way, isn’t falsifying information to a law enforcement agency, illegal? (I’ll deal with CAIR on that one later)..
(For those who have not read my article which apparently provoked this outrage by Islamists, read it at this link.)

Here is their post… and my response will be italicized throughout their post.

CAIR Asks DOJ to Probe Arkansas Business Declared ‘Muslim-Free Zone’ by Owner

CAIR: The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today said it has asked U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder to investigate a Hot Springs, Ark., shooting range that has been declared a “Muslim-free zone” by its owner.

CAIR: “The owner claims the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) agrees with her claimed right to bar customers based on their faith.”

This is false information CAIR is attempting to pass off as true. I have never stated that ATF gives Federal Firearms License holders permission or directives to bar customers BASED ON FAITH. I have never made such a statement. I would like for CAIR to show me proof that I ever made such a statement. They can not because I have not.
Read what I said about the ATF in my article from my website at this link.

In a letter to Attorney General Holder, CAIR wrote in part:

CAIR: “[The shooting range owner] appears to be misinterpreting the advice given to her and refusing service to all Muslims, which cannot be a correct interpretation of compliance with federal gun laws and the U.S. Constitution.
1) What advise given to me and by whom?
2) There are no “muslims banned ” signs on my property.. There are no questions on my sign in sheets or paperwork inquiring about a person’s religious affiliation. I absolutely have not refused service to anyone based on their religion. There is not a muslim in America who can say and prove I turned him away because of his religion.
In fact, two of them shot at my range several weeks ago and their behavior was so strange, it frightened other customers who refused to shoot here because of their strange behavior.

CAIR: “Given the recent spike in anti-Muslim rhetoric, including Islamophobic statements by government officials, community leaders and media outlets, death threats, and other bias incidents targeting Muslims, I urge you to investigate this matter soon.

CAIR’s use of the term Islamophobic, is more politically correct BS designed to marginalize anyone who speaks out against Islam and its true teachings. A phobia is an irrational fear of something. I would venture to say that anyone who has the guts to step up and speak out against a “religion” that the most barbaric, brutal and violent terrorists in the world align themselves with, is not fearful. Islamaphobes are people who fear, and cower from that fear, not those who speak out.

CAIR: “CAIR believes that systematically banning Muslims from a place of business is a violation of federal laws prohibiting racial and religious discrimination and will inevitably result in a hostile environment for ordinary Muslims in Arkansas.”

I wonder if CAIR believes that systematically supporting terrorism by teaching jihad and acts of terror in Mosques, might contribute to a hostile environment for ordinary Muslims in America?

CAIR sent copies of its letter to the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, the governor of Arkansas, the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, the U.S. Attorney for the Western District of Arkansas, and the ATF’s Little Rock Field Office.

Apparently CAIR failed to send them a copy of my article (which prompted all of this attention) which includes the fact that my life has been repeatedly threatened by Islamists who don’t like it that I share verses straight from their Quran which dictate violence against non-Muslims. Apparently its okay for a “theocracy” to command its followers to hate, murder, and terrorize all people who refuse to submit or convert to Islam.. and… apparently I’m expected to rent a loaded gun to someone at my range who aligns himself with such a religion, not knowing which Muslims are devout enough to follow those dictates and which ones choose to ignore those passages.

For those of you who are interested… here are the passages from the Quran that have provoked threats on my life by Muslims over the past five years. If Islam is so peaceful, why would they be so angry that I am sharing verses straight from their “holy book”…which, by the way, I have read and studied. Also, former federal prosecutor, Andrew McCarthy wrote an entire book about Islam and its threat to America…. An entire book, which I also read. I wonder why CAIR didn’t ask the DOJ to investigate McCarthy?

Of course the fact that he’s a former federal prosecutor might make him a difficult target.
It’s much easier to bully and threaten average American citizens like me who have a business to lose and a life to destroy. We are the easy targets.

I’ve been a target of Islamist threats for five years..fully expecting at any time one of them to follow through with the threat.
I may go down for speaking the truth about Islam, but… this is a mountain I’m willing to die on….

Islam..VERSES FROM THE QURAN.. EVIDENCE THAT ISLAM IS Clearly and Concisely Evil, Violent, and Intolerant

The Quran:
Tabari 9:69 “Killing Unbelievers is a small matter to us” The words of Muhammad, prophet of Islam.

Ibn Ishaq: 990 – Lest anyone think that cutting off someone’s head while screaming ‘Allah Akbar!’ is a modern custom, here is an account of that very practice under Muhammad, who seems to approve.

Ibn Ishaq: 992 – “Fight everyone in the way of Allah and kill those who disbelieve in Allah.” Muhammad’s instructions to his men prior to a military raid.

Tabari 7:97 The morning after the murder of Ashraf, the Prophet declared, “Kill any Jew who falls under your power.” Ashraf was a poet, killed by Muhammad’s men because he insulted Islam. Here, Muhammad widens the scope of his orders to kill. An innocent Jewish businessman was then slain by his Muslim partner, merely for being non-Muslim.

Quran (2:191-193) – “And slay them wherever ye find them, and drive them out of the places whence they drove you out, for persecution [of Muslims] is worse than slaughter [of non-believers]… but if desist, then lo! Allah is forgiving and merciful. And fight them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah.”
There is a good case to be made that the textual context of this particular passage is defensive war, even if the historical context was not. However, there are also two worrisome pieces to this verse. The first is that the killing of others is authorized in the event of “persecution” (a qualification that is ambiguous at best). The second is that fighting may persist until “religion is for Allah.” The example set by Muhammad is not reassuring.

Quran (2:244) – “Then fight in the cause of Allah, and know that Allah Heareth and knoweth all things.”

Bukhari (52:256) – The Prophet… was asked whether it was permissible to attack the pagan warriors at night with the probability of exposing their women and children to danger. The Prophet replied, “They (i.e. women and children) are from them (i.e. pagans).” In this command, Muhammad establishes that it is permissible to kill non-combatants in the process of killing a perceived enemy. This provides justification for the many Islamic terror bombings.

Ibn Ishaq: 327 – “Allah said, ‘A prophet must slaughter before collecting captives. A slaughtered enemy is driven from the land. Muhammad, you craved the desires of this world, its goods and the ransom captives would bring. But Allah desires killing them to manifest the religion.’”

Quran (2:216) – “Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know not.” Not only does this verse establish that violence can be virtuous, but it also contradicts the myth that fighting is intended only in self-defense, since the audience was obviously not under attack at the time. From the Hadith, we know that Muhammad was actually trying to motivate his people into raiding caravans with this verse.

Abu Dawud (14:2527) – The Prophet said: Striving in the path of Allah (jihad) is incumbent on you along with every ruler, whether he is pious or impious

Muslim (1:33) – the Messenger of Allah said: I have been commanded to fight against people till they testify that there is no god but Allah, that Muhammad is the messenger of Allah

Bukhari (8:387) – Allah’s Apostle said, “I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: ‘None has the right to be worshipped but Allah

Muslim (1:149) – “Abu Dharr reported: I said: Messenger of Allah, which of the deeds is the best? He (the Holy Prophet) replied: Belief in Allah and Jihad in His cause…”

Muslim (20:4645) – “…He (the Messenger of Allah) did that and said: There is another act which elevates the position of a man in Paradise to a grade one hundred (higher), and the elevation between one grade and the other is equal to the height of the heaven from the earth. He (Abu Sa’id) said: What is that act? He replied: Jihad in the way of Allah! Jihad in the way of Allah!”

Muslim (20:4696) – “the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: ‘One who died but did not fight in the way of Allah nor did he express any desire (or determination) for Jihid died the death of a hypocrite.'”

Muslim (19:4321-4323) – Three separate hadith in which Muhammad shrugs over the news that innocent children were killed in a raid by his men against unbelievers. His response: “They are of them (meaning the enemy).”
Quran (3:56) – “As to those who reject faith, I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help.”

Quran (3:151) – “Soon shall We cast terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers, for that they joined companions with Allah, for which He had sent no authority”. This speaks directly of polytheists, yet it also includes Christians, since they believe in the Trinity (ie. what Muhammad incorrectly believed to be ‘joining companions to Allah’).

Quran (4:74) – “Let those fight in the way of Allah who sell the life of this world for the other. Whoso fighteth in the way of Allah, be he slain or be he victorious, on him We shall bestow a vast reward.” The martyrs of Islam are unlike the early Christians, led meekly to the slaughter. These Muslims are killed in battle, as they attempt to inflict death and destruction for the cause of Allah. Here is the theological basis for today’s suicide bombers.

Quran (4:76) – “Those who believe fight in the cause of Allah…”

Quran (4:89) – “They but wish that ye should reject Faith, as they do, and thus be on the same footing (as they): But take not friends from their ranks until they flee in the way of Allah (From what is forbidden). But if they turn renegades, seize them and slay them wherever ye find them; and (in any case) take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

Quran (4:95) – “Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of Allah with their goods and their persons. Allah hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath Allah promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward,-” This passage criticizes “peaceful” Muslims who do not join in the violence, letting them know that they are less worthy in Allah’s eyes. It also demolishes the modern myth that “Jihad” doesn’t mean holy war in the Quran, but rather a spiritual struggle. Not only is the Arabic word used in this passage, but it is clearly not referring to anything spiritual, since the physically disabled are given exemption. (The Hadith reveals the context of the passage to be in response to a blind man’s protest that he is unable to engage in Jihad and this is reflected in other translations of the verse).

Quran (4:104) – “And be not weak hearted in pursuit of the enemy; if you suffer pain, then surely they (too) suffer pain as you suffer pain…” Is pursuing an injured and retreating enemy really an act of self-defense?

Quran (5:33) – “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this, that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement”

Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them” No reasonable person would interpret this to mean a spiritual struggle.

Quran (8:15) – “O ye who believe! When ye meet those who disbelieve in battle, turn not your backs to them. (16)Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless maneuvering for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey’s end.”

Quran (8:39) – “And fight with them until there is no more persecution and religion should be only for Allah” From the historical context we know that the “persecution” spoken of here was simply the refusal by the Meccans to allow Muhammad to enter their city and perform the Haj. Other Muslims were able to travel there, just not as an armed group, since Muhammad declared war on Mecca prior to his eviction. The Meccans were also acting in defense of their religion, since it was Muhammad’s intention to destroy their idols and establish Islam by force (which he later did). Hence the critical part of this verse is to fight until “religion is only for Allah.” According to Ibn Ishaq (324), Muhammad justified the violence further by explaining that “Allah must have no rivals.”

Quran (8:57) – “If thou comest on them in the war, deal with them so as to strike fear in those who are behind them, that haply they may remember.”

Quran (8:59-60) – “And let not those who disbelieve suppose that they can outstrip (Allah’s Purpose). Lo! they cannot escape. Make ready for them all thou canst of (armed) force and of horses tethered, that thereby ye may dismay the enemy of Allah and your enemy.”

Quran (8:65) – “O Prophet, exhort the believers to fight…”

Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them.” According to this verse, the best way of staying safe from Muslim violence is to convert to Islam. Prayer (salat) and the poor tax (zakat) are among the religions Five Pillars.

Quran (9:14) – “Fight them, Allah will punish them by your hands and bring them to disgrace…”

Quran (9:20) – “Those who believe, and have left their homes and striven with their wealth and their lives in Allah’s way are of much greater worth in Allah’s sight. These are they who are triumphant.” The “striving” spoken of here is Jihad.

Quran (9:29) – “Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and His Messenger, nor acknowledge the religion of Truth, (even if they are) of the People of the Book, until they pay the Jizya with willing submission, and feel themselves subdued.” “People of the Book” refers to Christians and Jews. This was one of the final “revelations” from Allah and it set in motion the tenacious military expansion, in which Muhammad’s companions managed to conquer two-thirds of the Christian world in just the next 100 years. Islam is intended to dominate all other people and faiths.
Quran (9:30) – “And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!”

Quran (9:38-39) – “O ye who believe! what is the matter with you, that, when ye are asked to go forth in the cause of Allah, ye cling heavily to the earth? Do ye prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? But little is the comfort of this life, as compared with the Hereafter. Unless ye go forth, He will punish you with a grievous penalty, and put others in your place.” This is a warning to those who refuse to fight, that they will be punished with Hell.

Quran (9:41) – “Go forth, light-armed and heavy-armed, and strive with your wealth and your lives in the way of Allah! That is best for you if ye but knew.” See also the verse that follows (9:42) – “If there had been immediate gain (in sight), and the journey easy, they would (all) without doubt have followed thee, but the distance was long, (and weighed) on them” This contradicts the myth that Muslims are to fight only in self-defense, since the wording implies that battle will be waged a long distance from home (in another country and on Christian soil, in this case, according to the historians).
Quran (9:73) – “O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination.” Dehumanizing those who reject Islam, by reminding Muslims that they are merely firewood for Hell, makes it easier to justify slaughter. It also explains why today’s devout Muslims have little regard for those outside the faith.

Quran (9:88) – “But the Messenger, and those who believe with him, strive and fight with their wealth and their persons: for them are (all) good things: and it is they who will prosper.”
Quran (9:111) – “Allah hath purchased of the believers their persons and their goods; for theirs (in return) is the garden (of Paradise): they fight in His cause, and slay and are slain: a promise binding on Him in truth, through the Law, the Gospel, and the Quran: and who is more faithful to his covenant than Allah? then rejoice in the bargain which ye have concluded: that is the achievement supreme.”

Quran (9:123) – “O you who believe! fight those of the unbelievers who are near to you and let them find in you hardness.”

Quran (18:65-81) – This parable lays the theological groundwork for honor killings, in which a family member is murdered because they brought shame to the family, either through apostasy or perceived moral indiscretion. The story, which is not found in any Jewish or Christian source, tells of Moses encountering a man with “special knowledge” who does things which don’t seem to make sense on the surface, but are then justified according to later explanation. One such action is to murder a youth for no apparent reason (74). However, the wise man later explains that it was feared that the boy would “grieve” his parents by “disobedience and ingratitude.” He was killed so that Allah could provide them a ‘better’ son.

Quran (21:44) – “We gave the good things of this life to these men and their fathers until the period grew long for them; See they not that We gradually reduce the land (in their control) from its outlying borders? Is it then they who will win?”

Quran (25:52) – “Therefore listen not to the Unbelievers, but strive against them with the utmost strenuousness…” “Strive against” is Jihad – obviously not in the personal context. It’s also significant to point out that this is a Meccan verse.

Quran (33:60-62) – “If the hypocrites, and those in whose hearts is a disease, and the alarmists in the city do not cease, We verily shall urge thee on against them, then they will be your neighbors in it but a little while. Accursed, they will be seized wherever found and slain with a (fierce) slaughter.” This passage sanctions the slaughter (rendered “merciless” and “horrible murder” in other translations) against three groups: Hypocrites (Muslims who refuse to “fight in the way of Allah” (3:167) and hence don’t act as Muslims should), those with “diseased hearts” (which include Jews and Christians 5:51-52), and “alarmists” or “agitators who include those who merely speak out against Islam, according to Muhammad’s biographers. It is worth noting that the victims are to be sought out by Muslims, which is what today’s terrorists do. If this passage is meant merely to apply to the city of Medina, then it is unclear why it is included in Allah’s eternal word to Muslim generations.

Quran (47:3-4) – “Those who reject Allah follow vanities, while those who believe follow the truth from their lord. Thus does Allah set forth form men their lessons by similtudes. Therefore when you meet in battle those who disbelieve, then smite the necks until when you have overcome them, then make (them) prisoners,” Those who reject Allah are to be subdued in battle. The verse goes on to say the only reason Allah doesn’t do the dirty work himself is in order to to test the faithfulness of Muslims. Those who kill pass the test. “But if it had been Allah’s Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of Allah,- He will never let their deeds be lost.”

Quran (47:35) – “Be not weary and faint-hearted, crying for peace, when ye should be uppermost (Shakir: “have the upper hand”) for Allah is with you,” This very important verse asserts that the Religion of Peace is not to grant peace to the broader society until Islamic rule has been established.

Quran (48:17) – “There is no blame for the blind, nor is there blame for the lame, nor is there blame for the sick (that they go not forth to war). And whoso obeyeth Allah and His messenger, He will make him enter Gardens underneath which rivers flow; and whoso turneth back, him will He punish with a painful doom.” Contemporary apologists sometimes claim that Jihad means ‘spiritual struggle.’ Is so, then why are the blind, lame and sick exempted?

Quran (48:29) – “Muhammad is the messenger of Allah. And those with him are hard (ruthless) against the disbelievers and merciful among themselves” Islam is not about treating everyone equally. There are two very distinct standards that are applied based on religious status.

Quran (61:4) – “Surely Allah loves those who fight in His way” Religion of Peace, indeed! This is followed by (61:9): “He it is who has sent His Messenger (Mohammed) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam) to make it victorious over all religions even though the infidels may resist.”

Quran (61:10-12) – “O ye who believe! Shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye believe in Allah and His Messenger, and that ye strive (your utmost) in the Cause of Allah, with your property and your persons: That will be best for you, if ye but knew! He will forgive you your sins, and admit you to Gardens beneath which Rivers flow, and to beautiful mansions in Gardens of Eternity.” This verse was given in battle. It uses the Arabic word, Jihad.

Quran (66:9) – “O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey’s end.” The root word of “Jihad” is used again here. The context is clearly holy war, and the scope of violence is broadened to include “hypocrites” – those who call themselves Muslims but do not act as such.
From the Hadith:

Bukhari (52:177) – Allah’s Apostle said, “The Hour will not be established until you fight with the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say. “O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.”

Bukhari (52:220) – Allah’s Apostle said… ‘I have been made victorious with terror’

Abu Dawud (14:2526) – The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Three things are the roots of faith: to refrain from (killing) a person who utters, “There is no god but Allah” and not to declare him unbeliever whatever sin he commits, and not to excommunicate him from Islam for his any action; and jihad will be performed continuously since the day Allah sent me as a prophet until the day the last member of my community will fight with the Dajjal (Antichrist)

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • RickG

    Hell, we can’t go into their mosques (not that I want to, but that’s a different story). Tell them you will let any muslim come and shoot for free the day you can set foot in Mecca! End of story…buy the pig anyway…who didn’t love Arnold?

    • ftg

      They have permits, tax exempt statuses etc by law they have to let you in or it has become a private organization for profit, matter of national security etc. Hell maybe start going to their place of terror get some license plate #’s and report them as threatening you with a weapon, have a witness with you, hell lieing and treason are the new democracy standards now.

    • joe Broz

      Non-Muslim women are not allowed to enter Saudi Arabia.

      • JacksonPearson

        Self Explanatory….

    • The signs of the end times are everywhere…

      As we witness such things as the spread of globalism, the building of a one-world church, the increase of wickedness, the breakdown of the traditional family, the destruction of that priceless bastion of liberty called America, the normalization of homosexuality, the callous murder of babies, the filthy pop culture, the breathtaking increase in governmental surveillance, we become fearful, uncertain, frustrated, angry, and discouraged, but this is because our minds and hearts are too focused on things of this world rather than things above. Too often we have the same short view that “conservative” unbelievers have rather than the long view that comes from the light of Bible prophecy…

      The devil is the god of this world, and his handiwork is evident everywhere, but he is not God and he is not in control of the times and the seasons…

      “Daniel answered and said, Blessed be the name of God for ever and ever: for wisdom and might are his: And he changeth the times and the seasons: he removeth kings, and setteth up kings: he giveth wisdom unto the wise, and knowledge to them that know understanding” (Dan. 2:20-21).

      We should stand in the confidence that the present evil is exceedingly temporary and will soon be cut down.

      Please visit our Bible Prophecy website at: itshallcometopass.org

  • dufus

    I refuse to patronize any businesses who give in to the muslims, KFC for their hand wipes, and Subway for the elimination of ham and bacon, Keep these dirt bags away from me and my family. If more of us take a stand maybe this political correctness b.s. will take a hike, They are a threat to our country and they get no respect here. Good for Jan Morgan. Time to stand up and be counted! Molon Labe.

    • Wumingren

      You surprised me with the claim that Subway had done away with ham and bacon, since I just had a Black Forest Ham foot-long sandwich today for lunch. Now, maybe I should check to see if it’s turkey “ham”?

      • ozzymax

        I believe it was Subway in the UK that did away with pork. But it’s only a matter of time before that happens here.

        • Wumingren

          That sounds about right for those nambie-pambie Brits. They’ve got Muslims raping their women in gang rapes and the PC crowd is afraid to do anything about it.

          I think I’ll write a letter to Subway America and explain to them what will happen if they knuckle under to Islamists the way the Brits did.

          If they do still go ahead and drop the bacon and ham, I’ll start a campaign of dropping by every Subway in my area and order a sandwich, but then get to the checkout and say, “Oops! I forgot my wallet.” Then they get to throw away that sandwich and take a loss. Passive aggressive all the way!

          • Chained

            Remember the UK is a GFZ

          • Did you see what happened to Kroger for refusing to give into mothers against guns? Their quarterly profit for this year went up by 20% compared to this time last year. Also the AEU has declared that CAIR is a terrorist organization.

        • ftg

          better yet, we all get pigs as pets and walk them by all the mosques, they think pigs are disgusting filthy animals and don’t eat pork.

          • Chained

            How about trained suicide pig bombers and send them into Mosques.

          • joe Broz

            They also think dogs are filthy disgusting animals. This, from people who haven’t accepted toilet paper.

        • joe Broz

          As of today, the UK is 25% Muslim. The British used to be intelligent.

      • Donnie J McDonald

        Pork is too popular here. If they do away with it, it might be in a place like Dearborne, Michigan, where there is a high percentage of muslims.

      • joe Broz

        Some, not all. Good to keep in mind, that not only do they intend to kill us, they intend to kill our pigs too!

    • Arcturus

      There are a few stores in the UK and Ireland that got rid of pork because of their large Muslim customer bases. There are Subways in India that have no meat at all because of their customer base. It’s called “doing business.” It’s called “capitalism.” Surely you’re not against capitalism?

      • Allan L

        No of course not. But I am against any business having to change to “halal” just because some cultists say so. They can go eat somewhere else like “at home”?!!

        • Donald Lang

          When those “cultists” are your customer base, you pander to their needs, or you go out of business.

  • SW

    Back to hell with all who worship satan! Hmmmm….doesn’t that include almost ALL of our “reps?”

  • Shorty Stuff

    Jan, just say the word and we’ll be there faster than a lard coated bullet. I don’t know how many patriots would show up, but I’d bet it could match the Bundy ranch.

    • Wumingren

      Indeed, we will be pushed too far. I will not fire the first shot, but I will fire the last 10,000 shots.

    • AFutureWithoutIgnorance

      I hope the next time such an event happens the government uses the same predator drones on the militia members as they do in Iraq. Would be quite fitting since an American terrorist is still a a terrorist.

  • Wumingren

    I suppose they could also display Christian icons all over the place, making every nook a place of prayer, with Bible quotes everywhere.

    • taliesin319

      Go for it. Holy pictures, Holy Water, everybody wear the cross or crucifix,
      Bible verses and DVD’s for sale covering every aspect of Christianity. Oh
      yeah and round up a whole slew of those old Hollywood epics re The Crusades.
      If there are any Jewish people at the range get those yahmakahs out and
      wear them. All while firing as much ordnance as the traffic will bear.

    • Arcturus

      Didn’t you ever see any vampire movies? The crucifix never works on them. They are people with brains, not ameobas with sensory response mechanisms.

  • Until we face up to it and deal with the reason Muslims are proliferating here in America, it’s only going to get worse. Clue: There were no Muslims, no Mosques, no Ft. Hood massacres, no Boston bombings, no beheadings in 1600 Christian Colonial America.

    There must, therefore, be a defining moment in America history that drastically altered the Christian course of America and that allowed Muslims to eventually take up residence in America. That point in history was in 1787 when the late 1700 founders replaced the 1600 governments of, by, and for God, based upon His immutable moral law, with their own humanistic government of, by, and for the people, based upon Enlightenment and Masonic concepts. More to the point, when the constitutional framers replaced the First Commandment (found intact in some of the 1600 Colonial Constitutions) with the First Amendment.

    When the First Amendment’s First Commandment-violating Free Exercise Clause was adopted, America was quickly transformed from what had been a predominantly monotheistic nation in 1600s into arguably the most polytheistic nation to exist, including Islam and its god Allah.

    For more, see online Chapter 3 “The Preamble: WE THE PEOPLE vs. YAHWEH” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective” at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-pt3.html, followed by Chapter 11 “Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism.”

    • ftg

      Yep, when socialists and communists misquoted the founders words, then after gaining political seats they went after our education system, then the kangaroo korts, then religion and so on. Now the MSM has been involved and helps idiotize Americans and others that are on benefits afraid to loose them should they try and fend and learn honestly.

    • joe Broz

      The founders were deists. What you’re saying is that the Constitution is wrong based on ????? a generation passing away? You make no sense. Muslims are here because some very stupid and avaricious politicians let them in. In this instance, we should emulate Australia…close our borders and deport all Muslims who do not comply with Australian law.

      • Joe, thanks for responding.

        Actually, except
        for Franklin, the key founders were not Deists. See Dr. Albert Mohler’s interview with
        Dr. Gregg Frazer at
        http://www.albertmohler.com/2012/09/10/what-did-americas-founders-really-believe-a-conversation-with-historian-gregg-frazer-transcript/.

        Dr. Frazer proves from the key founders’ own writings that they were neither Deists in the purest sense of the word, nor were they Christians in the Biblical sense of the word. Instead, they were Theistic Rationalists.

        (Dr. Mohler is President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary. Dr. Frazer is Professor of History of the Master’s College in California.)

        Trace why Islam is flourishing here America today to its genesis and its unequivocally because the constitutional framers replaced the First Commandment with the First Amendment. Like I already stated, there were not Muslims, no Ft. Hood Massacres, no Boston bombings, no beheadings in 1600 Christian Colonial America whose Constitutions were established on the First Commandment:

        Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1835 : “They [the 1600 Colonials] exercised the rights of
        sovereignty; they named their magistrates, concluded peace or declared
        war, made police regulations, and enacted laws as if their allegiance
        was due only to God. Nothing can be more curious and, at the same time
        more instructive, than the legislation of that period; it is there that
        the solution of the great social problem which the United States now
        presents to the world is to be found.

        “Amongst these documents we
        shall notice, as especially characteristic, the code of laws promulgated
        by the little State of Connecticut in 1650. The legislators of
        Connecticut begin with the penal laws, and … they borrow their
        provisions from the text of Holy Writ. “Whosoever shall worship any
        other God than the Lord,” says the preamble of the Code, “shall surely
        be put to death.” This is followed by ten or twelve enactments of the
        same kind, copied verbatim from the books of Exodus, Leviticus, and
        Deuteronomy.” (Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 2 vols. (New York: NY: The Colonial Press, 1899) vol. 1, pp. 36-37.)

        For more, see online Chapter 11 “Amendment 1: Government-Sanctioned Polytheism” of “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective.”

        • joe Broz

          So why does our currency say: “In God we Trust?”

          • The phrase “under God” was not added to the pledge until 1954. Even if had been added it’s inception or earlier wouldn’t prove anything regarding the Biblical compatibility of the Constitution.

            The only thing by which everything (including the Constitution) must be ethically tested is God Almighty’s immutable morality as reflected in His commandments, statutes, and judgments. When the Constitution is tested by this standard it is found to be anything but Biblically compatible. There is hardly an Article or Amendment that’s not antithetical, if not seditious, to Yahweh’s sovereignty and morality.

            See online book “Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective,” in which every Article and Amendment is examined by the Bible, at http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/blvc-index.html.

          • joe Broz

            The phrase “in God we trust” has been on our currency a lot longer that 1954

          • Donald Lang

            “In God we trust” first appeared on U.S. coins in 1864[3] and has appeared on paper currency since 1957.[4] Some secularists object to its use.[5]

        • joe Broz

          You’re a very sick person. I hope you don’t vote.

          • T. Edward Price

            Pastor Weiland is sick how, exactly? Is it because he articulates his points very well? Is it because he provided you with sufficient information to recant of your ignorance? Or perhaps it’s because “USA, USA, USA!” He is correct that the First Amendment violates the First Commandment. Either Islam is protected, or Christianity is protected. God’s law doesn’t allow for both.

        • Donald Lang

          Running a country by Biblical law is now different than running it by Sharia law, it is still unjust.

        • AFutureWithoutIgnorance

          Very interesting that you choose to bring up heinous acts that have occurred in the name of Islam, but choose to ignore atrocities committed by Christians in America — or even by some of our country’s veterans.

          If by chance, you did forget, let me remind you of some of these events.

          Oklahoma City Bombing: Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols
          2012 Aurora Shooting: James Holmes
          Sandy Hook Elementary School Shooting: Adam Lanza

          The list continues, but the point has already been made. To figure that religion is the problem is a lazy man’s perspective — with a lack of desire to understand the underlying issues. While I would continue writing, I figure some with such views would also most likely support the KKK. And I hate to waste more time or energy just to have my words fall on closed ears.

  • mule man

    F these subhuman mongrels

  • mathis1689

    Ma’am I live about 2 hours from you. If any of these Islamic animals want to play Cowboys and Muslims you just let me know. I might be older and slower than I was in the day but I can still qualify as Sharpshooter even now.

  • taliesin319

    Good for Jan Morgan. If a pack of them walked in and killed a crew of American citizens you can be sure that Ovomit would send whatever Mosque they attended a cordial letter saying how very good a job he did to emphasize the teachings of Muhammud, ” that most perfect pattern of conduct ” PBS=piss,pus, and pigs hit be forever upon him.

    • ftg

      Be kind of hard reading a letter if the mosque burned down while full.

      • taliesin319

        Wishful thinking.

  • daisykmt

    Thank you, Jan, for posting the scriptures for all to see. Everyone needs to read these and see what conclusion they come up with—peace and love, or hate and violence.

  • Zepp

    I sure am concerned for your safety Jan. These filthy animals will stop at nothing. I think we all knew years ago they’d be in our streets soon if we kept caving into this political correctness. And then you see idiots like Ben Affleck who still doesn’t get it. Wake up America!

  • Gregory Alan of Johnson

    Is she prepared for a federal raid, with the help of a county sheriff’s deputy?

    • joe Broz

      All 114 county sheriffs in my state have signed a petition to Obama saying that they will not violate their oath to protect the Constitution. The Constitution does not protect theocracies.

      • Gregory Alan of Johnson

        The Constitution is a “Theocracy”.

        • joe Broz

          No, it isn’t. You confuse a document with a government. We do not protect “religions” that have declared war on the U.S.

          • Gregory Alan of Johnson

            “We the People” are ‘worshiping’ an idol known as the Constitution. That is a theocracy of the “People”.

          • joe Broz

            Go back and read Jan’s definition of a Theocracy. Theocracies are run by clerics. The U.S. is not run by clerics, and we do not “worship” a document. We are a nation of laws and we are guided by laws. Your comments sound treasonous.

          • Gregory Alan of Johnson

            Who is “Jan” and what does their definition have to do with anything? If anything is treasonous, it is the 28 USC 3002 15A federal (municipal) corporation in DC illegitimately masquerading as gov’t.

          • joe Broz

            You’re no than dense. This entire conversation was generated on Jan Morgan’s website. Your diversions won’t change the elements of a theocracy.

          • dontdoitagain

            “…’worshipping’ an idol? Tortured language. Nobody is ‘worshiping’ an idol by following the founding documents of our country. You compare this to a false bloodthristy religion? A “theocracy” No wonder we are having problems. So according to you any government that has laws is a “theocracy”? Define “worship”. Your statement doesn’t make sense even in this context. Muslims worship allah and as a side problem have their government and laws set up to accomodate their barbaric so-called religion. That it not how our constitution was set up and we certainly don’t “worship” it in any way. Maybe the word you are searching for is “venerate”?

  • ftg

    WTP should start going to these terr or teaching “MASKS” disguised camps and record everything said or shown then we have evidence of the terr or they represent. If nothing is done by the Fraud gov then WTP send a letter to the Fraud gov stating no laws apply to WTP and we will travel in armed groups to rid the harassment and traitor politicians, LEO or others. All we are doing is pushing the inevetable to a sooner date before the Fraud gov has prepared completely for a dictatorship take over. Either way a revolution worldly or nationally is going to happen.

  • Chained

    Jan, make Mondays moozslum day and then be closed on Mondays. If they
    insist then keep a few pigs on the premises as a deterrent. They are
    your pets ya know.

  • Jebat

    Here is what CAIR *should* be saying:
    “CAIR believes that muslims committing crimes of intolerance against non muslims and committing those crimes in the name of islam will inevitably result in a hostile environment for ordinary Muslims.”

  • rhcrest

    Good for you Jan! I refuse to do any type of business whatsoever with muslims. If i even suspect someone is muslim forget it.

  • Ubin BUSHwhacked

    I have read all these 106 violent verses in the Quran, and can’t help think… Satan is all about this crap. Their own ideology proves they are following Satan.

  • Archie

    This is why Jan Morgan is one of my hero’s.
    Keep on walking tall Jan and if you need help I’m sure you will be overwhelmed.

  • robert

    we the people,who are the real government demand doj and the fbi investigate cair group.we the legal american taxpaying veterans/citizens demand an investigation of the cair group and the muslum training camps in maine/texas and upstate new york near hancock./and dearborn michigan we feel threatened by the cair group and these muslum training camps.and read the book the muslum mafia.we the people,who are the real government await your response.god bless all legal american veterans/citizens

  • RacistsRweakheartedcowards

    Jan, you ignorant bitch..

  • Bob Disquis

    Will the baby boomers just die already so our country can get ahead of this racist nonsense?

  • Matthew 6:5

    jan = BIGOT C U N T

  • AFutureWithoutIgnorance

    The blatant ignorance of this article and the ensuing comments are absolutely disgusting. But, I can’t say that it’s not expected. I just can’t wait for all these old and close-minded bigots to grow old and die. This will not only help these free-loaders, who will rely on future generations to support their social security, but their departure will also mean a much more progressive country.

    The only truly sad part are the young and misguided bigots. Who are cursed with the ignorant teachings of their parents. I hope that you will one day move beyond the blindness hate. However, if you choose not to, please stay in the backwoods and continue breeding with your relatives — leave the rest of society alone.

  • Landslug

    “law abiding citizens like me ”
    The civil rights act of 1964 is also a law

    • Smarterthanyou

      You are a slug, with no rights.