Quantcast

Cruz ‘s First Commercial of His Presidential Campaign

Jan Morgan
 

About the author: Jan is a nationally recognized 2nd Amendment Advocate/Speaker/ NRA Certified Firearms Instructor/ Associated Press Award winning investigative journalist/ Owner/Editor JanMorganMedia.com, Sr. Editor/Patriot Update/ Independent Constitutional Conservative. She is closely aligned with the Republican/ ... [read 's FULL BIO]

Senator Ted Cruz and his team sent me this copy of his first ad of his Presidential campaign that airs today and Easter weekend…

In this ad, Ted Cruz answers the question, Why he is running for President of the United States.

Posting Policy
We have no tolerance for comments containing violence, racism, vulgarity, profanity, all caps, or discourteous behavior. Thank you for partnering with us to maintain a courteous and useful public environment where we can engage in reasonable discourse. Read more.
  • Cruz can No longer be described as a good person or a good Senator. Treason is Not good! Get Real!

    “Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” — Isaiah 5:20 (KJV)

    Cruz targets Conservatives by telling US what we want to hear. Cruz thinks we are an “easy mark”. Cruz is Not a Conservative, Nor a Constitutionalist! Cruz has just showed his True values as a very evil man. In Your face evil as actions speak louder than words.

    Cruz is ready (like 0bama) to Usurp the office of POTUS.

    “Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves.” — Matthew 7:15 (KJV)

    There is NO difference between an 0bot and a Cruzbot!

    Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States says:

    “No Person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;”

    Cruz was born on December 22, 1970 in Calgary, Alberta

    Cruz’s father did not become a US citizen until 2005, so it is completely impossible for Cruz to be a “natural born citizen”.

    This issue is Not complicated at all and very easy to understand. Our Framers understood the definition of “natural born citizen” as clearly as we understand the definition of pizza.

    Our Framers used the law of Nations in DEFINING “natural born citizen”.

    Law of Nations, Book I, Ch. XIX, at §§ 212, is this:

    § 212: Natural-born citizens are those born in the country of parents who are citizens – it is necessary that they be born of a father who is a citizen. If a person is born there of a foreigner, it will be only the place of his birth, and not his country.

    • RDS

      I like Ted Cruz, I like what he says. AND YOU ARE CORRECT REGARDING NATURAL BORN CITIZEN.

      The United States Supreme Court in the case of Minor V. Happersett, 1874, looked at two issues specifically, the constitutional right to vote and the phrase natural born citizen. The Court rendered unanimously the definition that
      children born of PARENTS (note the plural) who are citizens are natural born
      citizens ELIGIBLE for the Presidency.

      The courts decision states: “…At common-law, with the
      nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These
      were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or
      foreigners.”

      Mr. Obama’s father was a British subject at the time of his birth and the father of Mr. Cruz was Canadian.
      Thus we can conclude that the Democrat Party has foisted the greatest fraud on the United States, and the Republicans will do the same…both are shredding our Constitution.

      MINOR v. HAPPERSETT, 88 U.S. 162; 21 Wall. 162 OCTOBER,
      1874, Term; available at http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/minorvhapp.html,
      (last visited 25 October 2011); Minor v.
      Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167, 21 Wall. 162, 22 L.Ed. 627 (1875) Refer
      to paragraphs 17-19.

  • SandyT

    It really pains me to see conservatives fall for an ineligible candidate, just as the Obama fans fell for him, as their savior. As much as I like Cruz, Rubio and Jindal (my governor), none of them are natural born citizens. Cruz’s birth in Canada and only his mother a citizen makes him ineligible. Rubio and Jindal were both born on U.S. soil, but their respective parents were only green card holders, not citizens when their sons were born. They are NOT eligible for the presidency! Cruz and Rubio shouldn’t give up their Senate seats to run. We still need them to keep control of the Senate.